EXAMPLES OF AWARDS IN PEACEMAKING PROCESSES: A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THEIR ROLE IN CONFLICT REGULATION

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive study of the role of award systems in peacemaking processes through the prism of a historical analysis of specific cases of their application in the settlement of international conflicts. The work is based on an interdisciplinary approach that combines methods of political science, international law and the theory of symbolic interaction to identify mechanisms of the influence of awards on the dynamics of negotiation processes and the behavior of conflicting parties. The study covers the period from the beginning of the 20th century to the present, analyzing the evolution of award practices from classical diplomacy to modern forms of international recognition of peacemaking initiatives.The methodological basis of the study is a comparative-historical analysis of representative cases of awarding international awards in the context of specific conflict situations. The author investigates the correlation between the moment of awarding an award, its symbolic significance, and subsequent changes in the negotiation dynamics, analyzing both the immediate and long-term effects of award initiatives. Particular attention is paid to the role of media discourse and public opinion in strengthening or weakening the impact of symbolic recognition on conflict participants.The study also examines the institutional aspects of award systems, including selection criteria, decision-making procedures, and mechanisms for ensuring the legitimacy of award initiatives. The results of the study demonstrate that award systems function as an important element of «soft power» in international relations, capable of significantly influencing the motivation of conflict participants to seek peaceful solutions. A pattern is revealed between the prestige of the award, its international recognition, and the effectiveness of its impact on the conflict situation. The analysis shows that the most significant effect is achieved in cases where the award is accompanied by broad international support and media attention, creating additional pressure on the conflict parties towards a peaceful settlement. The study also reveals the limitations of the effectiveness of reward mechanisms in conditions of deep-rooted ethnic, religious or territorial disputes.The practical significance of the work lies in the development of recommendations for optimizing the use of reward initiatives in modern diplomatic practice. The author proposes a typology of reward strategies depending on the nature of the conflict, the stage of the negotiation process and the cultural and political context. Particular emphasis is placed on the potential of regional reward systems as an alternative to global initiatives in cases where the latter may be perceived as a manifestation of cultural imperialism or political pressure. The study contributes to the theory of conflict management, expanding the understanding of the role of symbolic resources in peacemaking processes and providing an empirical basis for further research in the field of preventive diplomacy.The conclusions of the study emphasize the need to integrate reward mechanisms into comprehensive conflict resolution strategies, taking into account their ability to mobilize public support for peace initiatives and create positive incentives for constructive dialogue between the opposing parties. The work opens up prospects for further research in the field of symbolic diplomacy and its role in shaping the culture of the world at the regional and global levels.The results obtained can be used by international organizations, diplomatic services and civil society institutions to increase the effectiveness of peacekeeping efforts in the face of modern global challenges.